Difference Between Joint Session and Special Session of Parliament

 

(AI Generated Representational Image) 

Harrdiip Bedii

India's parliamentary system is dynamic and constitutionally rich, comprising various types of sessions that serve specific legislative purposes. Among them, the Joint Session and the Special Session often generate curiosity and confusion. While both are significant in the functioning of Indian democracy, they are fundamentally different in terms of purpose, constitutional backing, frequency, and procedures. 


This article offers a clear, concise breakdown of these two unique sessions.


What is a Joint Session of Parliament?


A Joint Session of Parliament is a constitutionally mandated mechanism to resolve legislative deadlocks between the two Houses-Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha.


Constitutional Basis:

Article 108 of the Indian Constitution.


Purpose: To resolve disagreements on a particular bill when:


* One House passes a bill, but the other rejects it;


* Houses disagree on the amendments;


* More than six months elapse without agreement.


Clarification: The six-month period does not include days when the House is prorogued or adjourned for more than four consecutive days.


Presiding Officer: Speaker of the Lok Sabha.


Clarification: If the Speaker is absent, the Deputy Speaker of the Lok Sabha presides. If both are absent, the Deputy Chairman of the Rajya Sabha presides. If all are absent, any other member as determined by the members present may preside.


Frequency: Very rare; only three joint sessions have occurred (1961, 1978, and 2002).


Examples:


Dowry Prohibition Bill (1961)


Banking Service Commission Repeal Bill (1978)


Prevention of Terrorism Bill (2002)


Clarification: Money Bills and Constitutional Amendment Bills cannot be resolved by a Joint Session.


What is a Special Session of Parliament?


A Special Session of Parliament refers to a non-regular session convened by the government to discuss important matters, commemorate events, or pass urgent legislation.


Constitutional Mention: No direct mention; conducted under Article 85, which empowers the President to summon Parliament.


Clarification: While there is no explicit provision for "Special Session" in the Constitution, Article 85 allows the President to summon Parliament at any time, on the advice of the Council of Ministers.


Purpose:


* Marking historic events (e.g., 75 years of Independence in 2023)


* Urgent law-making or political crises


* Budget discussions (in emergency situations)


Presiding Officer: Usual presiding officers of both Houses.


Frequency: Held occasionally, based on political or national significance.


Examples:


1972: Marking 25 years of independence


1997: 50th Independence Anniversary


2023: Transition to the new Parliament building


Clarification: The President’s address at the start of the first session after each general election or each year is not a “Special Session” or “Joint Session” for legislative purposes, but a ceremonial joint sitting under Article 87.


Why Understanding These Differences Matter


Understanding these distinctions helps voters, students, and policy watchers grasp how the Parliament functions in resolving conflicts versus addressing special circumstances. It also clarifies the scope and constitutional safeguards in India’s law-making process.


Know the System, Empower Yourself


Both Joint and Special Sessions reflect the vibrancy and flexibility of the Indian Parliamentary system. While one is a constitutional conflict-resolution tool, the other is a strategic instrument used by governments to highlight important milestones or address urgent matters. Understanding the difference equips citizens to follow parliamentary affairs more critically and responsibly.


If you found this article helpful, share it with others to spread awareness about India’s legislative processes. Stay informed and actively participate in India’s democratic journey!

(With AI Assistance)

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post

Contact Form